Re: configuring party to receive 837D edi msg

Glad that you got it working!

Eric
http://blog.biztalk-info.com
http://biztalk-info.com

"rp" <rp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:55BF10C3-64B9-474B-8E12-A883275F5EB6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Solved it !!!
>
> I was doing everything right from party configuration to making sure I 
> have
> the correct  837D message. I only needed some patience for the BTS to 
> process
> the 837D edi file. It was a 191Kb fle and my local box was slow to
process
> the file. All I had to do was to wait till it finished processing.
>
> My bad sorry...
>
> RP
>
> "rp" wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I did verify and yes I have specified multiple schems per functional 
>> group.
>>
>> I also validated the 837D message with 837D(multiple) schema in VS.NET
>> successfully. But the message is not being processed by the receive 
>> location
>> using edi receive pipeline.
>>
>> I have a party that sends 270 and 837d messages and I am able to
process 
>> 270
>> messages successfully but having trouble with 837D.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> "Eric Stott" wrote:
>>
>> > In the party definition you have specified multiple schemas per 
>> > functional
>> > group, correct?
>> >
>> > Eric
>> > http://blog.biztalk-info.com
>> > http://biztalk-info.com
>> >
>> > "rp" <rp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > news:F389986D-8FEB-42E7-A6D8-FF46348C09A5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >I am using R2.
>> > >
>> > > "Eric Stott" wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Are you using the Covast or R2 bits?
>> > >>
>> > >> Eric
>> > >> http://blog.biztalk-info.com
>> > >> http://biztalk-info.com
>> > >>
>> > >> "rp" <rp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > >> news:0002859E-7EF7-49C3-A55C-656AFC3DF08E@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > How do we go about configuring Party for receving 837D edi
message 
>> > >> > that
>> > >> > is
>> > >> > validated by a schema that sup****ts multiple debatching?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >