Re: HL records in 837

If memory serves me correct, even batchng puts a claim in a transaction 
(which would mean that the HL number would be 1). Can you confirm that 
batching creates a single claim in a transaction.

Eric
http://blog.biztalk-info.com

"Redd" <redbastid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1184015939.570973.272670@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The reason it is currently set to "1" is that the orchestration only
> processes a single claim, then sends the result to the HIPAA adapter
> for batching.  Many claims then make it into the single file, but any
> and all processing is done on a single claim only.  Therefore, there
> is no knowledge that the claim being processed is the nth claim in the
> batch.
>
> Would I therefore have to change this to process ALL claims in a
> single map so I could use the looping functoid like you say?  Or, do
> you know of a way to accomplish this given a single claim as I
> described above?
>
> Or, turn off batching to produce 1 file per claim?  How easy is it to
> do that?
>
> Thanks
>
>